@VulcanMan6 1yr1Y
Sure, everyone has their own right to live, but no one's right to live takes precedence over any other person's right to their own body; that's why organ and blood donations are optional and not enforced by the state, because even if a person will die/is dying, you still have the right to deny them access to your own body. Your right over who can or cannot use your body, at any time, for any or no reason, is absolutely more important than any other person's right to life; simply having the right to live does not entitle someone to another person's body, even if their life literally depends on it.
@98GJMZZIndependent1yr1Y
I understand where you are coming from but I will choose to disagree
@98GJMZZIndependent1yr1Y
According to this website I am a better match with Hillary than you So…
@VulcanMan6 1yr1Y
Well, I don't like Hillary, so that may be understandable...
@VulcanMan6 1yr1Y
That's what having the personal choice means; you don't have to get one if you don't want to.
@TruthHurts10111mos11MO
That's blatantly false; obviously you have not the slightest understanding of the concept of natural rights which is what our country was founded on, which states that rights can be in conflict but THE MOST IMMEDIATE, IMPORTANT, AND INALIENABLE RIGHT of all is that to life, and whenever it contradicts another right the right to life is the one that must be preserved.
@VulcanMan6 8mos8MO
So do you support forced organ donation?
@9C3CZ6D1yr1Y
I agree. I'm a devout member of one of the most conservative and Biblically accurate Christian denominations in America (The Southern Baptist Convention).
@VulcanMan6 8mos8MO
Was that supposed to be a good thing..?
unborn children don't have rights yet I can get being against abortion if its after 6 months in but other than that 100% pro choice
@98ZTTPC1yr1Y
life starts a conception even scientist have confirmed this. I dont think it’s justifiable to kill an unborn baby because of the mother and fathers actions and their selfish needs? Do you?
@VulcanMan6 1yr1Y
Of course life starts at conception, because the original cells have to be living in order to grow in the first place. Literally no one is debating the fact that the cells are alive, because they would have to be alive for it to even be a living fetus (even though you and science are likely talking about a different meaning of "life" here). The entire abortion argument is about bodily autonomy and consent...the "life" of the fetus is completely irrelevant. YOU have sole and total say over who can or cannot use your body, at any time, for any or no reason. So to answer your question: yes, it is absolutely justifiable to abort an unborn baby if the mother does not consent to it using her body, even if her reasoning is purely because she doesn't want to be pregnant anymore...