Public funding to support landmarks would remove the need of government support
@9JH58WB4mos4MO
Without government support cultural landmarks will be subject to the will of those with the most money, not the public interest.
@Freedom763wks3W
Absolutely. History lovers (such as myself) will gladly contribute voluntary donations to private historical societies to preserve our most important historical landmarks. The beauty of privatisation is that force and coercion are removed from the calculation – no one, who wants to spend his money on something else, is being forced through taxation to fund historical sites. It would dramatically expand American freedom, in addition to making these sites *even better* since free-market competition would encourage these organisations to keep their sites clean, trash-free, informative, and enjoyable.
@9JD689T4mos4MO
No, the government must fund and support architecture in communities.
@9JD5XCPPeace and Freedom4mos4MO
No they couldn't, if a world war 3 happens only the government power could control it
I don't think so, there is nothing really to protect them.
No if people see an ability to profit of the land they will take it and would be near impossible to mantain.
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
