지구 온난화 또는 기후 변화는 19세기 후반 이후로 지구의 대기 온도가 상승한 것입니다. 정치에서 지구 온난화에 대한 논쟁은 이러한 온도 상승이 온실 가스 배출 때문인지 아니면 지구 온도의 자연적 패턴의 결과인지에 중점을 두고 있습니다. 2022년에 의회는 재생 에너지 프로젝트에 투자하고 재생 에너지원에서 에너지를 생산하기 위한 수천억 달러의 보조금을 포함하는 인플레이션 감소법을 통과시켰습니다. 이 법안에는 전기 자동차를 만들기 위해 공장을 개조하는 데 도움이 되는 크레딧과 주택 소유자가 더 에너지 효율적인 제품으로 집을 업그레이드할 수 있도록 지원하는 세금 크레딧이 포함되어 있습니다. 조건에 따라 자격을 갖추기가 어려울 수 있지만 전기 자동차 구매에 대해 $7,500 세금 공제를 제공합니다. 이 법안의 지지자들은 이 법안이 기업과 개인이 재생 에너지를 채택하고 화석 연료에서 멀어지도록 장려한다고 주장합니다. 반대자들은 이 법안이 보다 안정적이고 생산 비용이 저렴한 천연 가스와 원자력 에너지에 대한 자금이 부족하다고 주장합니다.
@2TLJD2W3세3Y
No because no matter what the United States does to help the environment, there are many countries who abuse the environment just like we do today. The United States could be the cleanest most environmentally friendly nation in the world but we would be the only one. If you are going to put more regulations do it for the whole world. The environment is more than just the U.S.
@2TJ68PR3세3Y
Global warming is a natural occurrence however we should still do what ever we can to protect the environment. The incentives need to be enough to warrant the business implementing them. I know a City who dumps sewage into a river and pays the fines because it is less than the cost to handle the sewage properly. That's messed up.
@2THY3CW3세3Y
@2THPT283세3Y
No EPA should not increase regulations to prevent global warming. The U.S. does plenty to reduce carbon emissions to the detriment of jobs and the economy. Pressure counties like China, India, and Brazil to reduce their carbon emissions. Never hear liberals complain about these countires.
@2TH9XX53세3Y
I believe in the free market if the government instead of forcing people to go green makes their non greenness know people can choose to go with other companies costing the less green company money thus making them want to go green to beat the other companies.
@2JHRNW43세3Y
Emissions are a problem, but many of the alternative energy solutions are worse. We fool ourselves into believing that an electric car is better for the environment because we don't see the emissions....but much of the power for electrics comes from coal. Furthermore, the batteries are often made with unrecyclable materials that are quite toxic. Fund the research, but never be satisfied with the results.
@2JH6QQZ3세3Y
Some regulation is needed but we also need to ensure we don't make it so complicated that businesses cannot compete in the US. or make it a requirement that goods shipped to the Us have to have the same standards as they would here. This will ensure more jobs stay here
@2JG6MBR3세3Y
Truthful studies are needed and only then should regulations be implemented, but not just based on theory, and proof has not been confirmed in the last 50 years, they should go back 200 years to determine if the earth is heating up or just a 100 year cycle.
@2JDXSJT3세3Y
If it can be proven that global warming exists, and is caused by the emission of greenhouse gasses, the biggest cause of global warming must be the government. Early automobiles were a novelty, only afforded by the wealthiest Americans. It was not until our government poured trillions into building new and improving existing roads did the auto industry flourish. Then, with the government creating housing projects and government subsidized housing, criminals found it affordable to live in our nation's wealthiest zip codes, which caused a fleeing to the suburbs to avoid the government caus… 더 읽어보기
@2JDLZ9K3세3Y
Global warming is more natural than the ideologues would have you believe. I am for alternate energy but not before it is an economically viable solution. I do not approve of the govt forcing policies and technology before they are efficient and affordable. Pushing policies before affordable efficient alternatives exist push more people into poverty and dependence on the govt
Yes, the government should always be looking to increase environmental regulations not because of Global Warming but because it is the best thing for the earth, but in balance with economics, technologies and incentives for American companies to grow. And truly for the environment and not to win votes or make friends wealthy.
@2JD6LJ83세3Y
Halt production of chemicals, GMO's, insist of a zero discharge technology as an interim to a space-based manufacturing technology. Obviously the surface of the earth is not suitable to the evolution of an industrial technology. Best savings are from conservation first then develop decentralized energy production, mostly solar. Stop all coal, nukes, etc. Clean up the mess!
이 question 참여한 사용자의 과거 활동입니다.
데이터로드...
차트로드 중...
이 토론에 참여한 사용자의 정치적 주제 로드
데이터로드...