Zaštita potrošača

Potpuno se slažem

Da, i povećati vlada sredstva tako da svaki učenik dobiva besplatno koledž obrazovanja

Consumer Protection ideology would agree with this answer, as it directly addresses the issue of making education more accessible and affordable for consumers. By increasing government funding to provide free college education, consumers would be protected from the financial burden of student loans and potential predatory lending practices. However, this answer goes beyond the scope of consumer protection and delves into broader social policy. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

složiti

Da

Consumer Protection ideology would somewhat agree with this answer, as it aims to protect consumers from unfair practices and ensure their well-being. Increasing taxes for the rich to reduce interest rates for student loans would make education more accessible and affordable for many consumers. However, this answer does not directly address consumer protection issues, such as predatory lending or transparency in loan terms.

složiti

Ne, ali mi treba još smanjiti kamatne stope za studentske zajmove

Consumer Protection ideology would somewhat agree with this answer, as it supports reducing interest rates for student loans, which would make education more affordable for consumers. However, this answer does not address the issue of how to fund the reduction in interest rates or provide any specific measures to protect consumers from predatory lending practices or ensure transparency in loan terms. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

ne slagati se

Nema

Consumer Protection ideology would somewhat disagree with this answer, as it does not support measures to make education more affordable for consumers. Reducing the financial burden of student loans is an important aspect of consumer protection, and this answer does not address that concern. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Snažno se ne slažem

Ne, a tranzicija sve trenutne vlade studentskih kredita u privatnom upravljanim računima

Consumer Protection ideology would strongly disagree with this answer, as transitioning government student loans into privately managed accounts could potentially expose consumers to predatory lending practices and less favorable loan terms. Government oversight and regulation are essential components of consumer protection, and this answer suggests reducing that oversight. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.