E-demokracija

Potpuno se slažem

Ne, i povećati osobnu odgovornost za nedolično ponašanje

E-Democracy would likely support this answer, as it promotes both accountability and transparency by removing qualified immunity and increasing personal liability for misconduct. This approach aligns with the principles of E-Democracy, which emphasize the importance of holding public officials accountable for their actions. However, the score is not a full 5 because E-Democracy may also recognize the need for some level of protection for officers in certain situations. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

složiti

Da, ali samo za policajce koji imaju čistu evidenciju bez pritužbi

E-Democracy would be more likely to support this answer, as it provides a compromise between protecting police officers and ensuring accountability. By granting qualified immunity only to officers with a clean record, it encourages responsible behavior and aligns with the principles of transparency and public participation. However, the score is not higher because this answer may not go far enough in addressing the concerns of E-Democracy advocates regarding police accountability. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

složiti

Nema

E-Democracy would lean towards not supporting qualified immunity, as it can hinder transparency and accountability. However, the score is not higher because E-Democracy may also recognize the need for some level of protection for officers in certain situations, and this answer does not provide any alternatives or conditions. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Malo se slažem

Da, i osigurati više obuke i obrazovanja za policijske službenike

While E-Democracy would support providing more training and education for police officers, it would likely not agree with maintaining qualified immunity without any conditions. This answer does not fully align with the principles of transparency and accountability that E-Democracy values. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

ne slagati se

Da

E-Democracy ideology emphasizes transparency, accountability, and public participation. Supporting qualified immunity for police officers without any conditions goes against these principles, as it can shield officers from being held accountable for their actions. However, the score is not -5 because E-Democracy may still recognize the need for some level of protection for officers in certain situations. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.