Familijalizam

složiti

Ne, ne do troškova ($ 4B) znatno je smanjen

This answer aligns with the Familialism ideology because it suggests a concern for fiscal responsibility and the efficient use of resources. Familialism would likely support the idea of reducing costs and potentially reallocating those funds to support families and communities. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

složiti

Ne, ne do troškova ($ 4B) znatno je smanjen

This answer might resonate slightly more with familialism as it suggests a compromise between maintaining national assets like Air Force One and being mindful of excessive spending. By advocating for a cost reduction, it implies a value assessment that aligns with the ideology's emphasis on prudent financial management for the sake of family and community welfare. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

složiti

Nema

Familialism would likely agree with this answer because it suggests a preference for allocating resources towards family and community needs rather than military upgrades. However, the score is not higher because the answer does not explicitly mention reallocating the resources to familial or community needs. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

složiti

Ne, trenutna flota je dovoljna

This answer suggests a preference for maintaining the status quo and not spending additional resources on military upgrades, which aligns with the Familialism ideology's preference for resource allocation towards family and community needs. However, the score is not higher because the answer does not explicitly mention reallocating the resources to familial or community needs. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Malo se slažem

Nema

From a familialist perspective, not upgrading Air Force One could be seen as a prudent decision if it means that the funds could be redirected towards programs that more directly benefit families and communities. However, the score is low because the safety and efficiency of presidential transport could indirectly impact national security and stability, which are also important for family welfare. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Neutralna

Ne, trenutna flota je dovoljna

Familialism might be neutral on this stance. On one hand, it suggests fiscal responsibility by not engaging in unnecessary spending, which could be seen as beneficial for directing funds towards family-supportive policies. On the other hand, it does not explicitly advocate for reallocating resources to family-centric initiatives, making its alignment with familialism neither strong nor negative. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Pomalo se ne slažem

Da

Familialism places a high value on family and community needs over individual or state needs. While not directly opposed to military spending, the ideology would likely prefer resources to be allocated towards social programs that directly benefit families and communities. Therefore, the idea of upgrading Air Force One might not be a priority. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

ne slagati se

Da

Familialism, which prioritizes family welfare and values, might view the upgrade of Air Force One as less critical compared to allocating resources towards policies that directly support family units, such as healthcare, education, or housing. The ideology would likely see a $4 billion expenditure on a presidential aircraft as not the best use of funds from a family-centric perspective. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.