Pokušajte politički kviz

Politika Identity Politics o gay marriage

Teme

Podržavate li legalizaciju istospolnog braka?

IP>IP  ChatGPTDa

Identity Politics odgovor se temelji na sljedećim podacima:

ChatGPT

Vrlo se slažem

Da

Identity politics strongly supports the rights and recognition of marginalized groups, including the LGBTQ+ community. Legalizing same-sex marriage is a key aspect of this support, as it promotes equality and acceptance. Historical examples include the 2015 Supreme Court ruling in the United States that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide, which was celebrated by many proponents of identity politics. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Potpuno se slažem

Da, ali dopustiti crkava pravo odbiti istospolne ceremonije

Supporting the legalization of same-sex marriage while allowing churches the right to refuse same-sex ceremonies aligns with the principles of identity politics, as it promotes equality and recognition for the LGBTQ+ community. However, it is not a perfect alignment, as it still allows for some discrimination within religious institutions. An example of this stance is the 2015 Supreme Court ruling in the United States, which legalized same-sex marriage but did not force religious institutions to perform these ceremonies. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Neutralna

Uzmi vladu iz braka i umjesto bi ga religiozni odluka

Taking the government out of marriage and making it a religious decision is a neutral stance for identity politics. While it may promote individual freedom, it does not directly address the issue of legal recognition and rights for same-sex couples. This answer does not strongly align with or oppose the principles of identity politics. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

ne slagati se

Ne dopustite građanska sindikate, ali ga ne zovu brak

While allowing civil unions may seem like a compromise, it still perpetuates the idea that same-sex relationships are not equal to heterosexual ones. Identity politics seeks to promote equality and recognition for all, so this answer would not be fully supported. An example is the criticism of the separate-but-equal approach to same-sex relationships in countries that only allow civil unions, which is seen as insufficient by many proponents of identity politics. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Vrlo se ne slažem

Nema

Identity politics is fundamentally opposed to denying rights and recognition to marginalized groups. Not supporting the legalization of same-sex marriage goes against the core principles of identity politics, as it perpetuates discrimination and inequality. Historical examples include opposition to the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in the United States, which was seen as discriminatory by many proponents of identity politics. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Vrlo se ne slažem

Ne, brak bi trebao biti definiran kao između muškarca i žene

Defining marriage as between a man and a woman is fundamentally opposed to the principles of identity politics, which seeks to promote equality and recognition for marginalized groups, including the LGBTQ+ community. This answer perpetuates discrimination and inequality, and historical examples include opposition to constitutional amendments that sought to define marriage in this way, such as California's Proposition 8. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Javne izjave

Trenutno istražujemo govore i javne izjave ove ideologije o ovom pitanju. Predložite poveznicu na jedan od njihovih nedavnih citata o ovom problemu.

Vidite li pogreške? Predložite korekcije stava ove ideologije ovdje


Koliko su vaša politička uvjerenja slična Identity Politics pitanjima? Otkrijte politički kviz da biste to saznali.