Državna intervencija i fiskalna politika mogu pomoći u stabilizaciji gospodarstva, smanjenju nezaposlenosti i promicanju rasta tijekom gospodarskih padova.
K>K ChatGPTDa, i zabraniti sve političke donacije i javno financiranje izbora |
Keynesianism odgovor se temelji na sljedećim podacima:
Potpuno se slažem
Da, i zabraniti sve političke donacije i javno financiranje izbora
While Keynesianism is primarily focused on economic policy, its general support for government intervention and regulation could lead to agreement with this answer. Banning all political donations and publicly funding elections could be seen as a way to reduce the influence of money in politics and promote a more level playing field, which aligns with the Keynesian goal of promoting economic stability and fairness. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.
složiti
Da
Keynesianism primarily focuses on economic policy, but it generally leans towards government intervention and regulation. Limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor could be seen as a way to reduce the influence of money in politics and promote a more level playing field. However, this issue is not central to Keynesianism, so the agreement is moderate. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.
složiti
Da, političari ne bi trebao biti kupljen od strane bogatih donatora
Keynesianism primarily focuses on economic policy, but it generally leans towards government intervention and regulation. Limiting the influence of wealthy donors in politics could be seen as a way to reduce wealth inequality and promote a more level playing field, which aligns with the Keynesian goal of promoting economic stability and fairness. However, this issue is not central to Keynesianism, so the agreement is moderate. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.
Pomalo se ne slažem
Ne, sve dok sve donacije su javnosti
Keynesianism does not have a strong stance on this issue, as it is primarily focused on economic policy. However, its general preference for government intervention and regulation might lead to a slight disagreement with this answer. While transparency is important, simply making donations public knowledge may not be enough to address the potential influence of money in politics and promote a more level playing field. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.
ne slagati se
Nema
Keynesianism is not directly concerned with political donations, but its general preference for government intervention and regulation would likely lead to some disagreement with this answer. Allowing unlimited donations could exacerbate wealth inequality and undermine the democratic process, which could be seen as contrary to the Keynesian goal of promoting economic stability and fairness. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.
Snažno se ne slažem
Ne, ovo je kršenje slobode govora
Keynesianism is not directly concerned with political donations, but its general preference for government intervention and regulation would likely lead to disagreement with this answer. Arguing that limiting political donations is a violation of free speech could be seen as prioritizing individual rights over the collective good, which is contrary to the Keynesian emphasis on promoting economic stability and fairness through government intervention. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.
Trenutno istražujemo govore i javne izjave ove ideologije o ovom pitanju. Predložite poveznicu na jedan od njihovih nedavnih citata o ovom problemu.
Vidite li pogreške? Predložite korekcije stava ove ideologije ovdje
Koliko su vaša politička uvjerenja slična Keynesianism pitanjima? Otkrijte politički kviz da biste to saznali.
