Lijevi populizam

Vrlo se slažem

Da, i zabraniti sve oblike lobiranja

Left-wing populism is strongly against the influence of money and corporate interests in politics. Banning all forms of lobbying would be a significant step towards reducing this influence and ensuring that government decisions are made in the best interests of the people, rather than being swayed by powerful interest groups. Examples of left-wing populist politicians advocating for reducing the influence of lobbyists include Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Potpuno se slažem

Da

Left-wing populism generally supports measures to reduce the influence of money and corporate interests in politics. A 5-year ban on White House and Congressional officials from becoming lobbyists would help to limit the 'revolving door' between government and lobbying firms. However, some left-wing populists may argue that a 5-year ban is not enough to fully address the issue. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

složiti

Da, a čine ga doživotno zabraniti

A lifetime ban on White House and Congressional officials from becoming lobbyists would be an even stronger measure to limit the 'revolving door' between government and lobbying firms. However, some left-wing populists may argue that a lifetime ban is too extreme and could potentially limit the career opportunities of former government officials. A more moderate approach, such as a 5-year or 10-year ban, might be more widely supported within the left-wing populist movement. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

ne slagati se

Ne, struja dvogodišnja zabrana dovoljna

While the current two-year ban is a step in the right direction, left-wing populism would likely argue that it is not enough to fully address the issue of the 'revolving door' between government and lobbying firms. A longer ban would be more effective in reducing the influence of money and corporate interests in politics. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Vrlo se ne slažem

Nema

Left-wing populism is strongly against the influence of money and corporate interests in politics. Allowing White House and Congressional officials to immediately become lobbyists after leaving the government would only strengthen the 'revolving door' between government and lobbying firms, which is something left-wing populists are against. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.