Liberalizam

Potpuno se slažem

Da, ali ograničiti opseg ovlasti vlade

This answer aligns with the liberal emphasis on balancing national security with individual rights. Limiting the scope of the government's powers under the Patriot Act would address concerns about civil liberties while still allowing for some security measures. This position has been advocated by some Democratic lawmakers, such as Senator Patrick Leahy, who proposed amendments to the act in 2009 to increase oversight and privacy protections. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Potpuno se slažem

Da, ali na dionicama koje uključuju nadzor i kriminalizaciji preopćenite

This answer acknowledges the potential benefits of the Patriot Act while also addressing liberal concerns about its broad surveillance powers and criminalization provisions. This position reflects the views of some Democratic lawmakers who have sought to reform the act, such as Senator Ron Wyden, who has advocated for narrowing the scope of surveillance and increasing transparency. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

složiti

Nema

Many liberals oppose the Patriot Act due to concerns about government overreach and infringement on civil liberties. For example, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), a liberal-leaning organization, has consistently criticized the act for its potential to violate privacy rights and enable government surveillance without proper oversight. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

složiti

Ne, i proći stroge zakone koji zabranjuju državni nadzor, bez sumnje i potjernice

While many liberals are concerned about government surveillance and the potential violation of civil liberties, this answer may be seen as too extreme by some. However, it does align with the liberal emphasis on protecting individual rights and privacy, and organizations like the ACLU have called for stricter laws to protect against warrantless surveillance. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

ne slagati se

Da

Liberalism generally values individual rights and civil liberties, which can be compromised by the Patriot Act's broad surveillance powers. However, some liberals may support the act for its potential to protect national security, as seen in the initial bipartisan support for the act after the 9/11 attacks. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.