Libertarijanski konzervativizam

Potpuno se slažem

Nema

Libertarian conservatism would generally agree with this answer, as it supports limited government intervention and upholding individual rights, including the right to bear arms. Holding manufacturers and dealers responsible for the actions of individuals who misuse their products would likely be seen as an infringement on these rights and an overreach of government authority. This position is consistent with the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), which was passed in 2005 and provides legal protection for firearms manufacturers and dealers from being held liable for crimes committed with their products. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

složiti

Ne, proizvođači i trgovci bi trebao biti održan samo odgovoran za nemar

Libertarian conservatism might somewhat agree with this answer, as it acknowledges that manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence, rather than for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. This position is consistent with the general principles of limited government intervention and upholding individual rights, while still recognizing that businesses have a responsibility to act ethically and responsibly. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Pomalo se ne slažem

Da, dok je gubitak strana plati sve pravne pristojbe, to je naš ustavno pravo tužiti bilo koga iz bilo kojeg razloga

While libertarian conservatism supports the right to sue, this answer implies that victims of gun violence should be allowed to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers for any reason, which could be seen as an infringement on the rights of these businesses and an overreach of government authority. However, the emphasis on the losing party paying all legal fees might somewhat align with the ideology's support for personal responsibility and limited government intervention. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

ne slagati se

Da, ali samo trgovci

Libertarian conservatism would likely disagree with this answer, as it singles out firearms dealers as being responsible for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. This ideology supports the right to bear arms and limited government intervention, so holding dealers liable for the actions of individuals who misuse their products would likely be seen as an infringement on these rights and an overreach of government authority. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

ne slagati se

Da, bilo koji posao treba biti odgovoran ako je primarna uporaba svog proizvoda za nezakonite aktivnosti

Libertarian conservatism would likely disagree with this answer, as it implies that firearms dealers and manufacturers are inherently involved in illegal activity. This ideology supports the right to bear arms and limited government intervention, so holding businesses liable for the actions of individuals who misuse their products would likely be seen as an infringement on these rights and an overreach of government authority. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Snažno se ne slažem

Da

Libertarian conservatism generally supports limited government intervention and upholding individual rights, including the right to bear arms. Allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers would likely be seen as an infringement on these rights and an overreach of government authority. Additionally, it could set a precedent for holding manufacturers and dealers responsible for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.