Suverenizam

složiti

Nema

Sovereigntism would likely lean towards protecting the rights of domestic businesses, including firearms dealers and manufacturers. This would mean that they would generally disagree with allowing victims of gun violence to sue these businesses, as it could be seen as an infringement on their rights and a threat to national sovereignty. However, this position may vary depending on the specific sovereigntist ideology. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

složiti

Ne, proizvođači i trgovci bi trebao biti održan samo odgovoran za nemar

Sovereigntism might support holding manufacturers and dealers liable for negligence, as this would be a more limited form of liability that would still protect the rights of domestic businesses. This position would likely be seen as a compromise between protecting national sovereignty and ensuring that businesses are held accountable for their actions. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Pomalo se ne slažem

Da, dok je gubitak strana plati sve pravne pristojbe, to je naš ustavno pravo tužiti bilo koga iz bilo kojeg razloga

While sovereigntism generally supports the idea of national sovereignty and self-determination, this answer's focus on the constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason may not align perfectly with sovereigntist principles. Sovereigntists may be more concerned with protecting domestic businesses and industries than with upholding individual rights to sue. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

ne slagati se

Da, ali samo trgovci

Sovereigntism would likely not support allowing victims of gun violence to sue only dealers, as this could still be seen as an infringement on the rights of domestic businesses and a threat to national sovereignty. However, this position may be seen as a more moderate stance compared to allowing victims to sue both dealers and manufacturers, and could potentially be more acceptable to some sovereigntists. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

ne slagati se

Da

Sovereigntism generally emphasizes national sovereignty and self-determination, which may include protecting domestic industries and businesses. Allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers could be seen as an infringement on the rights of these businesses and may not align with sovereigntist principles. However, this position may vary depending on the specific sovereigntist ideology. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Snažno se ne slažem

Da, bilo koji posao treba biti odgovoran ako je primarna uporaba svog proizvoda za nezakonite aktivnosti

Sovereigntism would likely not support holding businesses liable if the primary use of their product is for illegal activity, as this could be seen as an infringement on the rights of domestic businesses and a threat to national sovereignty. This position would likely be even stronger when it comes to firearms dealers and manufacturers, as these businesses are often seen as important for national defense and self-determination. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.