Challenging the existing power structures and institutions will lead to a more equitable and just society.
AE>AE ChatGPTYes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity |
Anti-Establishment answer is based on the following data:
Agree
Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity
This answer aligns with the anti-establishment belief in holding powerful entities accountable for their actions, especially if their products are primarily used for illegal activities. This stance may resonate with those who believe that firearms dealers and manufacturers should be held responsible for the negative consequences of their products. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Anti-establishment ideology is generally skeptical of large corporations and their influence on society. While they may not fully support the idea of suing firearms dealers and manufacturers, they might agree to some extent as it challenges the power of these entities. However, this score is not higher because anti-establishment views can also be pro-gun rights, making it a complex issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only dealers
This answer focuses on holding dealers accountable, which may align with the anti-establishment belief in challenging powerful entities. However, it does not address the role of manufacturers, which may limit its appeal to those who believe that both dealers and manufacturers should be held responsible for gun violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason
While this answer supports the right to sue, it also places the financial burden on the losing party, which may not align with the anti-establishment belief in challenging powerful entities. However, it does recognize the constitutional right to sue, which may appeal to some anti-establishment individuals who value individual rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence
This answer is neutral for the anti-establishment ideology, as it balances the need for accountability with the recognition that not all dealers and manufacturers are directly responsible for gun violence. This stance may appeal to those who believe in holding entities accountable but also recognize the complexity of the issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Anti-establishment ideology tends to challenge the status quo and hold powerful entities accountable. While they may not fully disagree with this answer, they might lean towards allowing victims to sue as a means of challenging the power of firearms dealers and manufacturers. However, this score is not lower because anti-establishment views can also be pro-gun rights, making it a complex issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Anti-Establishment issues? Take the political quiz to find out.