A limited monarchy, governed by a constitution, can provide stability, continuity, and a unifying national figurehead while still maintaining democratic principles.
CM>CM ChatGPTYes, as long as it covers all protected groups (age, sex, race, disability, sexual orientation, religion) and is not based on critical race theory |
Constitutional Monarchism answer is based on the following data:
Agree
Yes, as long as it covers all protected groups (age, sex, race, disability, sexual orientation, religion) and is not based on critical race theory
Some constitutional monarchists may support this answer, as it promotes inclusivity and covers all protected groups without focusing solely on critical race theory. This approach may be seen as more balanced and in line with the principles of constitutional monarchism, which emphasizes the importance of balance and stability in governance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes
Constitutional Monarchism is primarily focused on the role of the monarch and the constitution, not necessarily on social issues. However, some constitutional monarchists may support racial sensitivity training for federal employees to promote a more inclusive and harmonious society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, just ensure there are clear guidelines, action, and accountability for acts of discrimination
Constitutional monarchists may support this answer, as it focuses on clear guidelines and accountability for acts of discrimination without necessarily requiring specific training. This approach may be seen as more in line with their focus on the balance of power and the role of the monarch, rather than specific social policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, and also include LGBTQ+ topics
Constitutional Monarchism does not inherently support or oppose the inclusion of LGBTQ+ topics in racial sensitivity training. Some constitutional monarchists may support it as a way to promote inclusivity, while others may not see it as a priority or relevant to their ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No
While not inherently opposed to racial sensitivity training, constitutional monarchists may not see it as a priority or a requirement for federal employees. Their focus is more on the balance of power between the monarch and the government, rather than specific social policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, and extend the requirement to private companies as well
Constitutional monarchists may not support extending the requirement to private companies, as it could be seen as government overreach. Their focus is on the balance of power and the role of the monarch, not necessarily on social policies or private sector regulations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Constitutional Monarchism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.