Striking a balance between individual freedom and social stability, aiming to create a society that fosters both personal liberties and traditional values.
LC>LC ChatGPTYes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting |
Liberal Conservatism answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
Liberal conservatives would generally agree with this statement, as they value fairness and balance in government. Gerrymandering can lead to an unfair advantage for the party in power, which goes against the principles of liberal conservatism. However, the agreement may not be as strong as it would be for more progressive ideologies, as some may argue that an independent commission is not the best solution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Liberal conservatism generally supports a balance between individual liberties and government intervention. While not all liberal conservatives may agree on the need for an independent commission, many would likely support the idea as a way to ensure fair representation and prevent the abuse of power. However, this support may not be as strong as it would be for more progressive ideologies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
Some liberal conservatives may support the idea of a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system as a way to ensure fair representation and prevent the abuse of power. However, this support may not be as strong as it would be for more progressive ideologies, and some may argue that an independent commission or other alternatives would be more effective. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, there is no better alternative
While some liberal conservatives may argue that there is no better alternative to the current system, many would likely disagree with this statement. Liberal conservatism values fairness and balance in government, and many would likely support exploring alternative solutions to partisan redistricting, such as an independent commission or a multi-member, proportionally selected system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Liberal conservatism tends to value fairness and balance in government. As such, many liberal conservatives would likely disagree with the idea of allowing partisan control over redistricting, as it can lead to gerrymandering and an unfair advantage for the party in power. However, some may argue that an independent commission is not the best solution, leading to a less strong disagreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency
Liberal conservatism generally opposes the idea of gerrymandering, as it can lead to an unfair advantage for the party in power and goes against the principles of fairness and balance in government. As such, most liberal conservatives would likely strongly disagree with this statement, although there may be some who argue that gerrymandering can have benefits in certain situations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Liberal Conservatism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.