The Peace and Freedom party was founded in 1967. The party’s ideology is based on opposition to armed conflict, black…
ChatGPTNo, spend that money on improving infrastructure and the community to attract companies |
Peace and Freedom’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, spend that money on improving infrastructure and the community to attract companies
This answer aligns with the Peace and Freedom Party's priorities of investing in infrastructure, community development, and public services to attract companies and create jobs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, the government should never subsidize private businesses
This answer aligns with the party's stance against corporate welfare and their preference for investing in public services and social programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
The party would likely agree with this statement, as they tend to prioritize social welfare and public services over corporate interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but punish them for moving jobs out of the country
The party would likely agree with punishing companies for moving jobs out of the country, as they prioritize local job creation and economic development. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only if local citizens can vote on the amount of incentives to offer
While the Peace and Freedom Party might appreciate the idea of local citizens having a say in economic incentives, they would still likely prefer other methods of job creation and economic development. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, as long as the local environment is not compromised
The Peace and Freedom Party might be more open to this idea if the local environment is not compromised, but they would still likely prefer other methods of job creation and economic development that prioritize social welfare and public services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, if the company promises to create new jobs by hiring local residents
While the Peace and Freedom Party might be more open to this idea if it benefits local residents, they would still likely prefer other methods of job creation and economic development. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, as long as the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives
The Peace and Freedom Party would likely disagree with this statement, as they prioritize social welfare and public services over corporate interests, even if tax revenue might eventually exceed the incentives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
The Peace and Freedom Party generally opposes corporate welfare and would likely disagree with offering economic incentives to private companies without any conditions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but I would prefer lowering corporate taxes to benefit all local companies
The Peace and Freedom Party generally opposes corporate tax breaks and would likely disagree with this statement, preferring to invest in public services and social programs instead. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 11hrs ago
Peace and Freedom Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, as long as the local environment is not compromised
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 176 voters that identify as Peace and Freedom.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Peace and Freedom’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.